PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBIY vs. IVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBIY vs. IVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIY achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than IVW's 13.68% return.


WBIY

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.17%
YTD
11.24%
6M
13.90%
1Y
29.67%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

IVW

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.39%
YTD
13.68%
6M
13.49%
1Y
33.77%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
18.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBIY vs. IVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBIY
WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF
11.24%13.00%8.36%13.80%-0.52%28.35%-8.48%24.82%-14.47%14.59%
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.68%21.95%35.82%29.83%-29.50%31.80%33.19%30.77%-0.21%27.21%

Correlation

The correlation between WBIY and IVW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2016

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between WBIY and IVW has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WBIY vs. IVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WBIY
IVW

Financial Services

18.7%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

16.4%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
9.4%

Communication Services

11.0%
18.0%

Technology

10.1%
49.3%

Industrials

9.4%
6.2%

Healthcare

6.2%
5.8%

Utilities

6.1%
0.4%

Energy

6.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.6%

Financial Services

WBIY
18.7%
IVW
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

WBIY
16.4%
IVW
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WBIY
13.1%
IVW
9.4%

Communication Services

WBIY
11.0%
IVW
18.0%

Technology

WBIY
10.1%
IVW
49.3%

Industrials

WBIY
9.4%
IVW
6.2%

Healthcare

WBIY
6.2%
IVW
5.8%

Utilities

WBIY
6.1%
IVW
0.4%

Energy

WBIY
6.0%
IVW
0.1%

Basic Materials

WBIY
1.9%
IVW
0.4%

Real Estate

WBIY
1.1%
IVW
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBIY vs. IVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIY
WBIY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
WBIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IVW
IVW Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVW Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBIY vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WBIYIVWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

2.14

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

2.88

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

2.47

+1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.05

10.19

+0.86

WBIY vs. IVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBIY Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the IVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBIY and IVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WBIYIVWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.14

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.76

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.45

-0.07

Drawdowns

WBIY vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIY drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, smaller than the maximum IVW drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIY and IVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBIYIVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.71%

-57.33%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-13.75%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.37%

-22.15%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.97%

-32.72%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-1.12%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-17.62%

+10.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

3.32%

-0.70%

Volatility

WBIY vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) is 4.01%, while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that WBIY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBIYIVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.30%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

12.37%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

15.87%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

21.16%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.65%

20.62%

+2.03%

WBIY vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIY has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBIY vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison

WBIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than IVW's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.35%0.40%0.43%1.03%0.92%0.46%0.82%1.63%1.28%1.30%1.51%1.51%
WBIY
WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF
4.36%4.73%4.57%4.87%4.40%3.94%5.10%4.54%3.25%5.84%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBIY and IVW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVW has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to WBIY (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBIY dropped -48.71% vs IVW's -57.33%.

On 5-year performance, IVW leads with 15.93% vs 9.43% for WBIY. On fees, IVW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, WBIY has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVW has performed better with a 15.93% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for WBIY.

WBIY has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 0.35% for IVW.

WBIY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IVW is Large Cap Growth Equities. WBIY tracks Solactive Power Factor High Dividend Index, while IVW tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WBI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for WBIY and 0.18% for IVW.

IVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBIY and IVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer