WBIF vs. POW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WBIF is a Global Equities fund actively managed by WBI, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WBIF charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

WBIF vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIF achieves a 18.21% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.98% return.

WBIF

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 2.61%
• 6M: 15.00%
• YTD: 18.21%
• 1Y: 24.99%
• 3Y*: 9.30%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 6.00%
• ALL TIME*: 4.11%

POW

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -5.46%
• 6M: 18.56%
• YTD: 38.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.18M	$2.14M	$2.63M
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	$783.61K	$393.57K	$177.99K

WBIF vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	18.21%	-1.96%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.98%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WBIF and POW is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

WBIF vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 81
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 76
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 85

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WBIF vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WBIF	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.49	—	—

Drawdowns

WBIF vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIF drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIF and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WBIF	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.29%	-28.02%	+7.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.34%	+18.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-5.66%	-1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WBIF	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	34.48%	-21.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.91%	34.48%	-21.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.40%	34.48%	-22.08%

WBIF vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIF has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WBIF vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.05%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WBIF and POW in my portfolio?

WBIF and POW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WBIF or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WBIF or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WBIF or POW?

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.05% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between WBIF and POW?

WBIF is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: WBI and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for WBIF and 0.75% for POW.