PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBIF vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBIF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIF achieves a 12.70% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 5.62%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


WBIF

1D
0.15%
1M
6.09%
YTD
12.70%
6M
12.42%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*
5.62%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBIF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
12.70%9.16%3.43%0.49%-8.38%16.56%-2.71%2.68%-4.68%19.42%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between WBIF and SPY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014

0.74

The correlation between WBIF and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

WBIF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WBIF
SPY

Financial Services

31.0%
11.8%

Technology

19.9%
35.9%

Industrials

14.6%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.3%

Utilities

10.3%
2.4%

Healthcare

3.4%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.8%

Energy

2.9%
3.6%

Communication Services

2.6%
11.3%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Financial Services

WBIF
31.0%
SPY
11.8%

Technology

WBIF
19.9%
SPY
35.9%

Industrials

WBIF
14.6%
SPY
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WBIF
11.1%
SPY
10.3%

Utilities

WBIF
10.3%
SPY
2.4%

Healthcare

WBIF
3.4%
SPY
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

WBIF
3.1%
SPY
4.8%

Energy

WBIF
2.9%
SPY
3.6%

Communication Services

WBIF
2.6%
SPY
11.3%

Basic Materials

WBIF
1.0%
SPY
1.8%

Real Estate

WBIF

-

SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBIF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIF
WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBIF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WBIFSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.08

2.38

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

3.24

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

3.16

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.69

14.72

-1.02

WBIF vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBIF Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBIF and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WBIFSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.38

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.82

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.87

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.59

-0.27

Drawdowns

WBIF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIF drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIF and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBIFSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.29%

-55.19%

+34.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-8.88%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

-18.76%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

-24.50%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.29%

-33.72%

+13.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-9.05%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.91%

-0.07%

Volatility

WBIF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that WBIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBIFSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

2.84%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.90%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

11.83%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.85%

17.05%

-4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.34%

17.94%

-5.60%

WBIF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIF has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBIF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
0.06%0.14%1.17%0.82%0.96%2.59%0.09%1.04%0.77%0.75%0.67%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBIF and SPY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WBIF has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBIF dropped -20.29% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 5.62% for WBIF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 5.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

WBIF is categorized as Global Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: WBI and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for WBIF and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBIF and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer