WBIF vs. SPY
WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WBIF is a Global Equities fund actively managed by WBI, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. WBIF is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WBIF returned 5.81%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBIF charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
WBIF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIF achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 5.81%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
WBIF
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
WBIF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | 12.87% | 9.16% | 3.43% | 0.49% | -8.38% | 16.56% | -2.71% | 2.68% | -4.68% | 19.42% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIF and SPY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2014 | 0.74 |
The correlation between WBIF and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
WBIF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WBIF
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
WBIF
SPY
Financial Services
WBIF
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
WBIF
SPY
Industrials
WBIF
SPY
Basic Materials
WBIF
SPY
Healthcare
WBIF
SPY
Consumer Defensive
WBIF
SPY
Utilities
WBIF
SPY
Communication Services
WBIF
SPY
Energy
WBIF
SPY
Real Estate
WBIF
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBIF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
WBIF
SPY
WBIF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WBIF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.67 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 11.92 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WBIF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIF drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIF and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.29% | -55.19% | +34.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -8.88% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.16% | -18.76% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -24.50% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.29% | -33.72% | +13.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -3.17% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -9.04% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.98% | -0.12% |
Volatility
WBIF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 4.73% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBIF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 4.87% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 9.85% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 12.50% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 17.15% | -4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 17.95% | -5.58% |
WBIF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIF has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBIF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.17% | 0.82% | 0.96% | 2.59% | 0.09% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 0.75% | 0.67% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBIF and SPY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to WBIF (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBIF dropped -20.29% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 5.81% for WBIF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, WBIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.
WBIF is categorized as Global Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: WBI and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for WBIF and 0.09% for SPY.
WBIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WBIF and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer