PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WBIF vs. FIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WBIF vs. FIXT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WBIF is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WBIF charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.

Performance

WBIF vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIF achieves a 12.70% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.47% return.

WBIF

1D
0.15%
1M
6.09%
YTD
12.70%
6M
12.42%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*
5.62%

FIXT

1D
0.11%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.60%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBIF vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF		12.70%9.63%
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF		0.47%4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between WBIF and FIXT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

0.28

WBIF vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WBIF
FIXT

Financial Services

31.0%

-

Technology

19.9%

-

Industrials

14.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Utilities

10.3%

-

Healthcare

3.4%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Energy

2.9%

-

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

WBIF
31.0%
FIXT

-

Technology

WBIF
19.9%
FIXT

-

Industrials

WBIF
14.6%
FIXT

-

Consumer Cyclical

WBIF
11.1%
FIXT

-

Utilities

WBIF
10.3%
FIXT

-

Healthcare

WBIF
3.4%
FIXT
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

WBIF
3.1%
FIXT

-

Energy

WBIF
2.9%
FIXT

-

Communication Services

WBIF
2.6%
FIXT

-

Basic Materials

WBIF
1.0%
FIXT

-

Real Estate

WBIF

-

FIXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF

Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF

Often compared with WBIF:
WBIF vs. SPYWBIF vs. USMVWBIF vs. WRNDWBIF vs. WBIGWBIF vs. GSWOWBIF vs. GKATWBIF vs. ISRA
Often compared with FIXT:
FIXT vs. AIRRFIXT vs. KLMTFIXT vs. VTFIXT vs. WBIGFIXT vs. AVGVFIXT vs. FLXRFIXT vs. UFO

Return for Risk

WBIF vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WBIF
WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
FIXT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBIF vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WBIFFIXTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.08

—

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

—

—

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

—

—

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

—

—

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.69

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WBIF vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WBIFFIXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.41

-1.10

Drawdowns

WBIF vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIF drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIF and FIXT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WBIFFIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.29%

-3.02%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.29%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.65%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-0.71%

-7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

—

—

Volatility

WBIF vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WBIFFIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

3.77%

+8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.85%

3.77%

+9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.34%

3.77%

+8.57%

WBIF vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIF has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WBIF vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FIXT's 5.54% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF		5.54%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WBIF
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF		0.06%0.14%1.17%0.82%0.96%2.59%0.09%1.04%0.77%0.75%0.67%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

WBIF and FIXT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FIXT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FIXT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

They also come from different issuers: WBI and Procure. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for WBIF and 0.75% for FIXT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBIF and FIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer