WBGSX vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WBGSX (William Blair Growth Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WBGSX returned 14.02%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for SCHG. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. WBGSX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

WBGSX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBGSX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, WBGSX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.02%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.

WBGSX

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -1.84%
• 6M: 4.85%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 13.88%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 14.02%
• ALL TIME*: 9.56%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 18.27%
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$247.66M	$249.87M	$339.91M
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

WBGSX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund	3.28%	10.69%	21.86%	37.75%	-29.75%	21.71%	36.12%	32.11%	4.88%	24.19%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.99%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WBGSX and SCHG is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.95

The correlation between WBGSX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WBGSX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WBGSX

WBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 9
WBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
WBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
WBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
WBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
WBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WBGSX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WBGSX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.82	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	1.20	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.15	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	0.83	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.95	2.62	-1.67

WBGSX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBGSX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WBGSX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBGSX drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBGSX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WBGSX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.05%	-34.59%	-18.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.70%	-16.41%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.45%	-23.39%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.90%	-34.59%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.90%	-34.59%	-2.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.74%	-3.10%	-3.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.50%	-5.19%	-6.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.17%	5.19%	+1.98%

Volatility

WBGSX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.32%. This indicates that WBGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WBGSX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	4.32%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.68%	12.90%	+1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.53%	16.67%	+1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.80%	22.42%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.65%	21.59%	-0.94%

WBGSX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBGSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

WBGSX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

WBGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.57%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund	42.57%	43.96%	34.53%	12.73%	4.59%	14.82%	15.07%	10.27%	38.86%	38.00%	8.81%	13.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WBGSX and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, WBGSX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WBGSX or SCHG?

WBGSX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to SCHG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBGSX dropped -53.05% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.