WBGSX vs. SCHD
WBGSX (William Blair Growth Fund) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both funds - WBGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by William Blair, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, WBGSX returned 14.98%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for SCHD. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBGSX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
WBGSX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBGSX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, WBGSX has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.98%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.
WBGSX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
WBGSX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund | 7.01% | 10.69% | 21.86% | 37.75% | -29.75% | 21.71% | 36.12% | 32.11% | 4.88% | 24.19% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBGSX and SCHD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WBGSX and SCHD has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBGSX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
WBGSX
SCHD
WBGSX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WBGSX | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 5.35 | -4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 12.94 | -10.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WBGSX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBGSX drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBGSX and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBGSX | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.05% | -33.37% | -19.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.70% | -4.61% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -16.13% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.90% | -16.85% | -20.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | -33.37% | -3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -2.47% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -3.31% | -8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.94% | 1.90% | +5.04% |
Volatility
WBGSX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that WBGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBGSX | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 3.58% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.87% | 7.73% | +6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 11.07% | +6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 14.36% | +7.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 16.71% | +3.91% |
WBGSX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBGSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBGSX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
WBGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.08%, more than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund | 41.08% | 43.96% | 34.53% | 12.73% | 4.59% | 14.82% | 15.07% | 10.27% | 38.86% | 38.00% | 8.81% | 13.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBGSX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WBGSX has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBGSX dropped -53.05% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WBGSX and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer