PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBGSX vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBGSX vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBGSX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 10.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WBGSX having a 14.98% annualized return and SCHB not far ahead at 15.28%.


WBGSX

1D
1.70%
1M
1.41%
YTD
7.01%
6M
6.22%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
14.98%

SCHB

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.52%
YTD
10.41%
6M
9.61%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
15.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBGSX vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
7.01%10.69%21.86%37.75%-29.75%21.71%36.12%32.11%4.88%24.19%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
10.41%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between WBGSX and SCHB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.93

The correlation between WBGSX and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBGSX vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBGSX
WBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBGSX vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBGSXSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

3.05

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

13.57

-10.70

WBGSX vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBGSX and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WBGSX vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBGSX drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBGSX and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBGSXSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-35.27%

-17.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.70%

-8.91%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-19.34%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.90%

-25.41%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

-35.27%

-1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-1.50%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-4.11%

-7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

2.00%

+4.94%

Volatility

WBGSX vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 4.80%. This indicates that WBGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBGSXSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

4.80%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.87%

10.00%

+3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

12.77%

+4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

17.34%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

18.37%

+2.25%

WBGSX vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBGSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBGSX vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

WBGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.08%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
41.08%43.96%34.53%12.73%4.59%14.82%15.07%10.27%38.86%38.00%8.81%13.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, WBGSX and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WBGSX has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to SCHB (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBGSX dropped -53.05% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBGSX and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer