WBGSX vs. SCHB
WBGSX (William Blair Growth Fund) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both funds - WBGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by William Blair, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, WBGSX returned 14.98%/yr vs 15.28%/yr for SCHB. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WBGSX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
WBGSX vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBGSX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 10.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WBGSX having a 14.98% annualized return and SCHB not far ahead at 15.28%.
WBGSX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
WBGSX vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund | 7.01% | 10.69% | 21.86% | 37.75% | -29.75% | 21.71% | 36.12% | 32.11% | 4.88% | 24.19% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 10.41% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBGSX and SCHB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.93 |
The correlation between WBGSX and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBGSX vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
WBGSX
SCHB
WBGSX vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WBGSX | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 3.05 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 13.57 | -10.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WBGSX vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBGSX drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBGSX and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBGSX | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.05% | -35.27% | -17.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.70% | -8.91% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -19.34% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.90% | -25.41% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | -35.27% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -1.50% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -4.11% | -7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.94% | 2.00% | +4.94% |
Volatility
WBGSX vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 4.80%. This indicates that WBGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBGSX | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 4.80% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.87% | 10.00% | +3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 12.77% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 17.34% | +4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 18.37% | +2.25% |
WBGSX vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBGSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBGSX vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
WBGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.08%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund | 41.08% | 43.96% | 34.53% | 12.73% | 4.59% | 14.82% | 15.07% | 10.27% | 38.86% | 38.00% | 8.81% | 13.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, WBGSX and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
WBGSX has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to SCHB (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBGSX dropped -53.05% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WBGSX and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer