WARP vs. XLI
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both Industrials Equities funds - WARP tracks the MarketVector Space Index while XLI tracks the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
WARP vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- -33.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLI
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
WARP vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | -13.52% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and XLI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
WARP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLI
WARP vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WARP | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WARP vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.34% | -62.26% | +20.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.34% | -0.87% | -40.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -9.19% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility
WARP vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.59% | 16.31% | +72.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.59% | 17.55% | +71.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.59% | 20.02% | +68.57% |
WARP vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WARP and XLI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.
XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.08% for XLI.
Find the right allocation for WARP and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer