WANT vs. TMF
WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WANT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WANT returned -5.36%/yr vs -30.52%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
WANT vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -14.08% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -6.13% return.
WANT
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- -14.08%
- 6M
- -14.66%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- -5.36%
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 6M
- -11.63%
- 1Y
- 0.90%
- 3Y*
- -20.78%
- 5Y*
- -30.52%
- 10Y*
- -16.56%
WANT vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | -14.08% | -6.94% | 60.52% | 114.43% | -83.03% | 84.81% | 45.26% | 90.07% | -24.91% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -6.13% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | 19.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between WANT and TMF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018 | -0.02 |
The correlation between WANT and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.19 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WANT vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WANT
TMF
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
WANT
TMF
-
Communication Services
WANT
TMF
-
Technology
WANT
TMF
-
Industrials
WANT
TMF
-
Basic Materials
WANT
-
TMF
-
Consumer Defensive
WANT
-
TMF
-
Energy
WANT
-
TMF
-
Financial Services
WANT
-
TMF
Healthcare
WANT
-
TMF
-
Real Estate
WANT
-
TMF
-
Utilities
WANT
-
TMF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WANT vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
WANT
TMF
WANT vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WANT | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.03 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 0.08 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WANT | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 0.03 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | -0.66 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.14 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
WANT vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WANT | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -92.89% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.27% | -26.51% | -14.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.53% | -56.31% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.89% | -88.81% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.58% | -92.23% | +33.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.07% | -43.63% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.11% | 11.49% | +3.62% |
Volatility
WANT vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 8.09%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WANT | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.45% | 8.09% | +7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.86% | 19.01% | +19.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.92% | 28.76% | +25.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.65% | 46.75% | +23.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.50% | 43.92% | +27.58% |
WANT vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
WANT vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than TMF's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.15% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | 0.62% | 0.65% | 0.61% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WANT and TMF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WANT has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to TMF (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 5-year performance, WANT leads with -5.36% vs -30.52% for TMF. On fees, WANT is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WANT has performed better with a -5.36% return vs -30.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WANT is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.62% for WANT.
WANT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 1.01% for TMF.
WANT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WANT and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer