PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WANT vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WANT vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -21.36% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 42.54% return.


WANT

1D
-3.36%
1M
-14.54%
YTD
-21.36%
6M
-26.83%
1Y
-0.82%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
-8.83%
10Y*

GUSH

1D
-0.22%
1M
-19.15%
YTD
42.54%
6M
41.51%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
-37.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
-21.36%-6.94%60.52%114.43%-83.03%84.81%45.26%90.07%-24.44%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
42.54%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-51.59%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and GUSH is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018

0.32

The correlation between WANT and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WANT vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WANT
GUSH

Consumer Cyclical

20.9%

-

Communication Services

0.3%

-

Technology

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

96.8%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

WANT
20.9%
GUSH

-

Communication Services

WANT
0.3%
GUSH

-

Technology

WANT
0.2%
GUSH

-

Industrials

WANT
0.0%
GUSH

-

Basic Materials

WANT

-

GUSH
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

WANT

-

GUSH

-

Energy

WANT

-

GUSH
96.8%

Financial Services

WANT

-

GUSH

-

Healthcare

WANT

-

GUSH

-

Real Estate

WANT

-

GUSH

-

Utilities

WANT

-

GUSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WANT vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT
WANT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WANTGUSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.13

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

0.88

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.05

2.32

-2.37

WANT vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WANT vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and GUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WANTGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-99.98%

+14.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.27%

-36.18%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.53%

-63.59%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.89%

-73.64%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.10%

-99.83%

+37.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-92.92%

+49.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.14%

13.77%

+2.37%

Volatility

WANT vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 19.12% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 18.01%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WANTGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.12%

18.01%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.03%

44.07%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.06%

56.58%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.98%

68.20%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.48%

93.43%

-21.95%

WANT vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

WANT vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than GUSH's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.75%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
0.68%0.65%0.61%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WANT and GUSH have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WANT has higher volatility (19.12%) compared to GUSH (18.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

On 5-year performance, GUSH leads with 6.25% vs -8.83% for WANT. On fees, WANT is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 18.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 6.25% return vs -8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WANT is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.68% for WANT.

WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WANT and GUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer