WAMA vs. GMOD
WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WAMA is passively managed, while GMOD is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GMOD.
Performance
WAMA vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WAMA
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOD
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.33% |
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAMA and GMOD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAMA vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAMA vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -4.37%, smaller than the maximum GMOD drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and GMOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAMA | GMOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -6.50% | +2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -1.51% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -1.13% | 0.00% |
Volatility
WAMA vs. GMOD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAMA | GMOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 9.07% | +5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 9.07% | +5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 9.07% | +5.17% |
WAMA vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAMA vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison
WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAMA and GMOD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOD.
GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.50% for GMOD.
Find the right allocation for WAMA and GMOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer