PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAMA vs. WIMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAMA vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAMA

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WIMA

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.61%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and WIMA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAMA vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WAMA vs. WIMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -4.37%, which is greater than WIMA's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and WIMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAMAWIMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-3.33%

-1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.16%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-0.92%

-0.14%

Volatility

WAMA vs. WIMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAMAWIMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

16.28%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

16.28%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

16.28%

-2.26%

WAMA vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAMA vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither WAMA nor WIMA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WAMA and WIMA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for WIMA.

WAMA and WIMA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

WAMA tracks WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index, while WIMA tracks WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.42% for WIMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAMA and WIMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer