WAMA vs. MATE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WAMA is passively managed, while MATE is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.

Performance

WAMA vs. MATE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAMA

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MATE

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 17.50%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	1.56%
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	3.58%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and MATE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.77

Return for Risk

WAMA vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -4.37%, smaller than the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and MATE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMA	MATE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-13.24%	+8.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-2.78%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-3.33%	+2.27%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAMA	MATE	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	22.97%	-8.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.02%	22.97%	-8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.02%	22.97%	-8.95%

WAMA vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMA vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WAMA nor MATE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMA and MATE in my portfolio?

WAMA and MATE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WAMA or MATE?

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAMA or MATE?

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAMA or MATE?

WAMA and MATE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WAMA and MATE?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.97% for MATE.