PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOD vs. DRES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOD vs. DRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOD achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly lower than DRES's 19.55% return.


GMOD

1D
-1.79%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRES

1D
-1.05%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
19.55%
6M
17.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
5.74%3.87%
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
19.55%0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOD and DRES is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOD vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMOD vs. DRES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMODDRESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

1.94

-0.17

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum DRES drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and DRES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMODDRESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-10.41%

+3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.05%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-2.30%

+1.14%

Volatility

GMOD vs. DRES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMODDRESDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.95%

18.33%

-9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.95%

18.33%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

18.33%

-9.38%

GMOD vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GMOD and DRES have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

GMOD vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than DRES's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
0.30%0.22%
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
0.88%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMOD and DRES have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMOD and DRES have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.30% for DRES.

GMOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while DRES is Mid Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOD and DRES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer