WAMA vs. BSR
WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and BSR (Beacon Selective Risk ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds - WAMA tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index while BSR tracks the NONE. Both are passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BSR.
Performance
WAMA vs. BSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WAMA
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSR
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA vs. BSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 2.77% |
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAMA and BSR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAMA vs. BSR — Risk / Return Rank
WAMA
BSR
WAMA vs. BSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WAMA | BSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.87 | 0.48 | +4.39 |
Drawdowns
WAMA vs. BSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum BSR drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and BSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAMA | BSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -15.68% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -4.84% | +4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -4.58% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility
WAMA vs. BSR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAMA | BSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.20% | 8.65% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 16.27% | -7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 16.27% | -7.07% |
WAMA vs. BSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than BSR's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAMA vs. BSR - Dividend Comparison
WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF | 2.81% | 2.89% | 0.89% | 1.08% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAMA and BSR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BSR.
BSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.
WAMA tracks WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index, while BSR tracks NONE. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 1.10% for BSR.
Find the right allocation for WAMA and BSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer