WAB vs. LRN
WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. WAB operates in Railroads (Industrials), while LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, WAB returned 14.26%/yr vs 23.80%/yr for LRN. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WAB vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAB achieves a 24.55% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 50.49% return. Over the past 10 years, WAB has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 14.26%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.80% annualized return.
WAB
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 24.55%
- 6M
- 23.99%
- 1Y
- 30.73%
- 3Y*
- 38.16%
- 5Y*
- 27.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
LRN
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 50.49%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- -31.17%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 26.27%
- 10Y*
- 23.80%
WAB vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 24.55% | 13.15% | 50.14% | 27.96% | 9.07% | 26.53% | -5.23% | 11.46% | -13.26% | -1.36% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 50.49% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAB and LRN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.30 |
The correlation between WAB and LRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WAB:
$45.27B
LRN:
$4.65B
WAB:
$7.07
LRN:
$9.68
WAB:
37.48
LRN:
10.10
WAB:
1.58
LRN:
0.25
WAB:
3.94
LRN:
1.86
WAB:
4.06
LRN:
2.83
WAB:
$11.51B
LRN:
$2.54B
WAB:
$3.89B
LRN:
$972.24M
WAB:
$2.33B
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAB vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
WAB
LRN
WAB vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAB | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | -0.49 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | -0.74 | +5.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAB vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAB drawdown since its inception was -71.85%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAB and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAB | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.85% | -81.41% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -64.07% | +50.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -64.07% | +40.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -64.07% | +40.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.08% | -64.07% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -42.46% | +40.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.96% | -36.27% | +12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 42.11% | -36.11% |
Volatility
WAB vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Stride, Inc. (LRN) have volatilities of 8.05% and 8.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAB | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.05% | 8.21% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.21% | 24.17% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 66.70% | -42.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 51.40% | -25.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.35% | 49.22% | -17.87% |
Dividends
WAB vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.66% | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.54% | 0.43% | 0.39% |
Financials
WAB vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WAB vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
WAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 2.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.0%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
WAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 517.00M and revenue of 2.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
WAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 362.00M and revenue of 2.95B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WAB and LRN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRN has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to WAB (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAB dropped -71.85% vs LRN's -81.41%.
WAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAB and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer