WAB vs. CSX
WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation) and CSX (CSX Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Railroads industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, WAB returned 15.37%/yr vs 20.03%/yr for CSX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WAB vs. CSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAB achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly higher than CSX's 28.26% return. Over the past 10 years, WAB has underperformed CSX with an annualized return of 15.37%, while CSX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.03% annualized return.
WAB
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 29.97%
- 6M
- 25.13%
- 1Y
- 39.07%
- 3Y*
- 40.05%
- 5Y*
- 28.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.37%
CSX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 28.26%
- 6M
- 27.24%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 20.03%
WAB vs. CSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 29.97% | 13.15% | 50.14% | 27.96% | 9.07% | 26.53% | -5.23% | 11.46% | -13.26% | -1.36% |
CSX CSX Corporation | 28.26% | 14.13% | -5.65% | 13.51% | -16.58% | 25.70% | 27.09% | 18.06% | 14.47% | 55.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAB and CSX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1995 | 0.45 |
The correlation between WAB and CSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
WAB:
$47.24B
CSX:
$86.02B
WAB:
$7.07
CSX:
$1.63
WAB:
39.12
CSX:
28.26
WAB:
4.11
CSX:
6.09
WAB:
4.24
CSX:
6.33
WAB:
$11.51B
CSX:
$14.15B
WAB:
$3.89B
CSX:
$3.64B
WAB:
$2.33B
CSX:
$5.55B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAB vs. CSX — Risk / Return Rank
WAB
CSX
WAB vs. CSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and CSX Corporation (CSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAB | CSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 3.90 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 10.39 | -3.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAB vs. CSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAB drawdown since its inception was -71.85%, roughly equal to the maximum CSX drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAB and CSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAB | CSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.85% | -69.19% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -11.89% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -29.44% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -29.44% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.08% | -40.55% | -23.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.88% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.94% | -15.91% | -8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.99% | 4.45% | +1.54% |
Volatility
WAB vs. CSX - Volatility Comparison
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to CSX Corporation (CSX) at 6.56%. This indicates that WAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAB | CSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 6.56% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.16% | 16.42% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.14% | 22.44% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.86% | 23.52% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.36% | 27.84% | +3.52% |
Dividends
WAB vs. CSX - Dividend Comparison
WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than CSX's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSX CSX Corporation | 1.17% | 1.43% | 1.49% | 1.27% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.33% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 2.00% | 2.70% |
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.66% | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.54% | 0.43% | 0.39% |
Financials
WAB vs. CSX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and CSX Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WAB vs. CSX - Profitability Comparison
WAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 2.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.0%.
CSX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 517.00M and revenue of 2.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.
CSX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported an operating income of 1.25B and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
WAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 362.00M and revenue of 2.95B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
CSX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSX Corporation reported a net income of 807.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in a net margin of 23.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WAB and CSX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WAB has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to CSX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAB dropped -71.85% vs CSX's -69.19%.
CSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAB and CSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer