LRN vs. CHGG
LRN (Stride, Inc.) and CHGG (Chegg, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Education & Training Services industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, LRN returned 21.75%/yr vs -14.19%/yr for CHGG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRN vs. CHGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRN achieves a 26.78% return, which is significantly higher than CHGG's 12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LRN has outperformed CHGG with an annualized return of 21.75%, while CHGG has yielded a comparatively lower -14.19% annualized return.
LRN
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -7.12%
- YTD
- 26.78%
- 6M
- 24.35%
- 1Y
- -43.57%
- 3Y*
- 29.92%
- 5Y*
- 21.07%
- 10Y*
- 21.75%
CHGG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -32.26%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- -23.36%
- 3Y*
- -50.90%
- 5Y*
- -58.11%
- 10Y*
- -14.19%
LRN vs. CHGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | 26.78% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 12.90% | -42.24% | -85.83% | -55.05% | -17.69% | -66.01% | 138.27% | 33.39% | 74.14% | 121.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRN and CHGG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2013 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
LRN:
$3.92B
CHGG:
$117.74M
LRN:
$9.68
CHGG:
-$0.79
LRN:
1.57
CHGG:
0.36
LRN:
2.39
CHGG:
0.97
LRN:
$2.54B
CHGG:
$318.78M
LRN:
$972.24M
CHGG:
$197.33M
LRN:
$424.60M
CHGG:
-$1.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRN vs. CHGG — Risk / Return Rank
LRN
CHGG
LRN vs. CHGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRN | CHGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.06 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.31 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | -0.54 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRN vs. CHGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRN drawdown since its inception was -81.41%, smaller than the maximum CHGG drawdown of -99.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRN and CHGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRN | CHGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.41% | -99.60% | +18.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.07% | -75.54% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.07% | -96.06% | +31.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.07% | -99.50% | +35.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.07% | -99.60% | +35.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.52% | -99.07% | +47.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.29% | -47.87% | +11.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.71% | 43.18% | -0.47% |
Volatility
LRN vs. CHGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stride, Inc. (LRN) is 18.09%, while Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a volatility of 31.69%. This indicates that LRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRN | CHGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.09% | 31.69% | -13.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.89% | 78.93% | -50.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.40% | 113.85% | -45.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.82% | 88.48% | -36.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.43% | 70.94% | -21.51% |
Dividends
LRN vs. CHGG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LRN nor CHGG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LRN vs. CHGG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stride, Inc. and Chegg, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRN vs. CHGG - Profitability Comparison
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CHGG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.89M and revenue of 63.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
CHGG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.04M and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
CHGG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chegg, Inc. reported a net income of 228.00K and revenue of 63.26M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRN and CHGG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGG has higher volatility (31.69%) compared to LRN (18.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRN dropped -81.41% vs CHGG's -99.60%.
CHGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRN and CHGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer