WAB vs. TRAK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK).

Performance

WAB vs. TRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WAB vs. TRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation	17.22%	13.15%	4.28%
TRAK Park City Group Inc	-38.40%	-43.84%	18.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WAB : $42.73B TRAK : $144.80M
EPS WAB : $7.87 TRAK : $0.38
PE Ratio WAB : 31.77 TRAK : 19.98
PEG Ratio WAB : 0.72 TRAK : 0.99
PS Ratio WAB : 3.83 TRAK : 6.18
PB Ratio WAB : 3.82 TRAK : 2.91
Total Revenue (TTM) WAB : $11.17B TRAK : $23.50M
Gross Profit (TTM) WAB : $3.81B TRAK : $19.97M
EBITDA (TTM) WAB : $2.18B TRAK : $8.12M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAB achieves a 17.22% return, which is significantly higher than TRAK's -38.40% return.

WAB

• 1D: 5.28%
• 1M: -5.32%
• YTD: 17.22%
• 6M: 24.96%
• 1Y: 38.49%
• 3Y*: 35.95%
• 5Y*: 26.62%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

TRAK

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -12.41%
• YTD: -38.40%
• 6M: -48.50%
• 1Y: -62.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WAB vs. TRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAB

WAB Risk / Return Rank: 82
WAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
WAB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
WAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
WAB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

TRAK

TRAK Risk / Return Rank: 3
TRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
TRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
TRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 1
TRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAB vs. TRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WAB	TRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	-1.64	+3.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	-2.94	+5.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.67	+0.61
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	-0.91	+3.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.12	-1.70	+7.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WAB vs. TRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the TRAK Sharpe Ratio of -1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAB and TRAK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WAB	TRAK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	-1.64	+3.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	-1.20	+1.55

Correlation

The correlation between WAB and TRAK is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WAB vs. TRAK - Dividend Comparison

WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than TRAK's 1.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation	0.42%	0.47%	0.42%	0.54%	0.60%	0.52%	0.66%	0.62%	0.68%	0.54%	0.43%	0.39%
TRAK Park City Group Inc	1.03%	0.62%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WAB vs. TRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAB drawdown since its inception was -71.85%, roughly equal to the maximum TRAK drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAB and TRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAB	TRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.85%	-70.93%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.82%	-68.67%	+54.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.62%	-69.02%	+63.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.10%	-28.28%	+4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.24%	36.83%	-30.59%

Volatility

WAB vs. TRAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is 8.79%, while Park City Group Inc (TRAK) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that WAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WAB	TRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.79%	11.61%	-2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.83%	29.48%	-13.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.83%	38.07%	-11.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.59%	37.81%	-12.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.23%	37.81%	-6.58%

Financials

WAB vs. TRAK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Park City Group Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 966.00M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.6%.

TRAK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.00M and revenue of 5.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.4%.

WAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 356.00M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.

TRAK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 1.82M and revenue of 5.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

WAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 378.00M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

TRAK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.69M and revenue of 5.86M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.