PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAB vs. TRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WAB vs. TRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAB achieves a 26.92% return, which is significantly higher than TRAK's -26.16% return.


WAB

1D
-2.35%
1M
5.40%
YTD
26.92%
6M
23.40%
1Y
34.33%
3Y*
38.94%
5Y*
27.20%
10Y*
15.09%

TRAK

1D
1.67%
1M
-9.89%
YTD
-26.16%
6M
-31.31%
1Y
-54.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAB vs. TRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
26.92%13.15%4.25%
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
-26.16%-43.84%19.37%

Correlation

The correlation between WAB and TRAK is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024

0.23

The correlation between WAB and TRAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WAB:

$46.13B

TRAK:

$171.61M

EPS

WAB:

$7.07

TRAK:

$104.56

PE Ratio

WAB:

38.20

TRAK:

0.09

PEG Ratio

WAB:

1.61

TRAK:

0.00

PS Ratio

WAB:

4.02

TRAK:

0.03

PB Ratio

WAB:

4.14

TRAK:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

WAB:

$11.51B

TRAK:

$5.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WAB:

$3.89B

TRAK:

$5.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

WAB:

$2.33B

TRAK:

$1.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAB vs. TRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAB
WAB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
WAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TRAK
TRAK Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAB vs. TRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WABTRAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.76

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

-0.86

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.74

-1.37

+7.11

WAB vs. TRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the TRAK Sharpe Ratio of -1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAB and TRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAB vs. TRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAB drawdown since its inception was -71.85%, roughly equal to the maximum TRAK drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAB and TRAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WABTRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.85%

-70.93%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-64.22%

+50.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-62.86%

+60.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.94%

-32.80%

+8.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.00%

40.60%

-34.60%

Volatility

WAB vs. TRAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is 7.47%, while Park City Group Inc (TRAK) has a volatility of 8.91%. This indicates that WAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WABTRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

8.91%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.33%

33.56%

-15.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.22%

43.26%

-19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.88%

40.60%

-14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.32%

40.60%

-9.28%

Dividends

WAB vs. TRAK - Dividend Comparison

WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than TRAK's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
0.86%0.62%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
0.41%0.47%0.42%0.54%0.60%0.52%0.66%0.62%0.68%0.54%0.43%0.39%

Financials

WAB vs. TRAK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Park City Group Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
2.95B
5.88B
(WAB) Total Revenue
(TRAK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WAB vs. TRAK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Park City Group Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
36.0%
86.3%
Portfolio components
WAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 2.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.0%.

TRAK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.08B and revenue of 5.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

WAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 517.00M and revenue of 2.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.

TRAK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.

WAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 362.00M and revenue of 2.95B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.

TRAK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WAB and TRAK have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRAK has higher volatility (8.91%) compared to WAB (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAB dropped -71.85% vs TRAK's -70.93%.

WAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAB and TRAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer