WAB vs. CLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WAB or CLF.
Correlation
The correlation between WAB and CLF is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WAB vs. CLF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WAB:
2.73
CLF:
-1.19
WAB:
3.78
CLF:
-2.04
WAB:
1.53
CLF:
0.77
WAB:
4.66
CLF:
-0.59
WAB:
16.68
CLF:
-1.64
WAB:
3.35%
CLF:
32.50%
WAB:
20.48%
CLF:
44.92%
WAB:
-71.84%
CLF:
-98.78%
WAB:
-7.37%
CLF:
-90.28%
Fundamentals
WAB:
$34.07B
CLF:
$4.89B
WAB:
$6.01
CLF:
-$0.94
WAB:
3.92
CLF:
-0.22
WAB:
$10.33B
CLF:
$19.97B
WAB:
$3.04B
CLF:
$631.00M
WAB:
$2.13B
CLF:
$932.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAB achieves a 50.68% return, which is significantly higher than CLF's -53.28% return. Over the past 10 years, WAB has outperformed CLF with an annualized return of 8.72%, while CLF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.19% annualized return.
WAB
50.68%
-2.66%
16.96%
51.91%
20.83%
8.72%
CLF
-53.28%
-15.05%
-35.15%
-54.89%
3.49%
4.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WAB vs. CLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WAB vs. CLF - Dividend Comparison
WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.66% | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.54% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.23% | 0.18% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
WAB vs. CLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAB drawdown since its inception was -71.84%, smaller than the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAB and CLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WAB vs. CLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is 6.17%, while Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a volatility of 15.36%. This indicates that WAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WAB vs. CLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities