PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAB vs. WAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

WAB vs. WAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Waters Corporation (WAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WAB vs. WAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
17.22%13.15%50.14%27.96%9.07%26.53%-5.23%11.46%-13.26%-1.36%
WAT
Waters Corporation
-21.60%2.39%12.68%-3.90%-8.06%50.59%5.89%23.85%-2.35%43.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WAB:

$42.73B

WAT:

$17.80B

EPS

WAB:

$7.87

WAT:

$10.77

PE Ratio

WAB:

31.77

WAT:

27.66

PS Ratio

WAB:

3.83

WAT:

5.61

PB Ratio

WAB:

3.82

WAT:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

WAB:

$11.17B

WAT:

$3.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WAB:

$3.81B

WAT:

$1.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

WAB:

$2.18B

WAT:

$970.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAB achieves a 17.22% return, which is significantly higher than WAT's -21.60% return. Over the past 10 years, WAB has outperformed WAT with an annualized return of 12.68%, while WAT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.


WAB

1D
5.28%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
17.22%
6M
24.96%
1Y
38.49%
3Y*
35.95%
5Y*
26.62%
10Y*
12.68%

WAT

1D
1.51%
1M
-6.76%
YTD
-21.60%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
-19.20%
3Y*
-1.29%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAB vs. WAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAB
WAB Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
WAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

WAT
WAT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
WAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAB vs. WAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) and Waters Corporation (WAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WABWATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

-0.50

+1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

-0.47

+2.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.94

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

-0.57

+3.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.12

-1.23

+7.34

WAB vs. WAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the WAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAB and WAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WABWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

-0.50

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.03

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.28

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.42

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between WAB and WAT is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WAB vs. WAT - Dividend Comparison

WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
0.42%0.47%0.42%0.54%0.60%0.52%0.66%0.62%0.68%0.54%0.43%0.39%
WAT
Waters Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WAB vs. WAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAB drawdown since its inception was -71.85%, smaller than the maximum WAT drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAB and WAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WABWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.85%

-80.12%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.82%

-31.32%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-44.27%

+20.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.08%

-44.27%

-19.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-29.88%

+24.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-23.99%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.24%

14.49%

-8.25%

Volatility

WAB vs. WAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is 8.79%, while Waters Corporation (WAT) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that WAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WABWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

9.56%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

25.10%

-9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.83%

38.46%

-11.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.59%

32.49%

-6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.23%

30.13%

+1.10%

Financials

WAB vs. WAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Waters Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
2.97B
932.36M
(WAB) Total Revenue
(WAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WAB vs. WAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Waters Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
32.6%
61.1%
Portfolio components
WAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 966.00M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.6%.

WAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waters Corporation reported a gross profit of 569.50M and revenue of 932.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.

WAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 356.00M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.

WAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waters Corporation reported an operating income of 270.52M and revenue of 932.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.0%.

WAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 378.00M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

WAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waters Corporation reported a net income of 225.21M and revenue of 932.36M, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.