VYM vs. VOOG
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.90%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for VOOG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOOG.
Performance
VYM vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 13.78% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 11.90%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.
VYM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
VOOG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 34.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
VYM vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.47% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.78% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 30.93% | -0.21% | 27.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and VOOG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VYM and VOOG has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VYM vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VYM
VOOG
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VYM
VOOG
Technology
VYM
VOOG
Healthcare
VYM
VOOG
Industrials
VYM
VOOG
Energy
VYM
VOOG
Consumer Defensive
VYM
VOOG
Consumer Cyclical
VYM
VOOG
Utilities
VYM
VOOG
Communication Services
VYM
VOOG
Basic Materials
VYM
VOOG
Real Estate
VYM
VOOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
VOOG
VYM vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VYM | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.37 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 2.49 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.76 | 10.32 | +4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VYM | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.16 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.76 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.88 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.91 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
VYM vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and VOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -32.73% | -24.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -13.71% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -22.18% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -32.73% | +16.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -32.73% | -2.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -1.08% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -4.97% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 3.31% | -1.53% |
Volatility
VYM vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 2.77%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 4.32% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 12.41% | -4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 15.85% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 21.19% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 20.73% | -4.39% |
VYM vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VYM vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than VOOG's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VYM and VOOG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs VOOG's -32.73%.
On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 18.15% vs 11.90% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOG.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.44% for VOOG.
VYM is categorized as Dividend, while VOOG is S&P 500. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.07% for VOOG.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and VOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer