VYM vs. LFRIX
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and LFRIX (Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund) are both funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while LFRIX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.95%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for LFRIX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LFRIX.
Performance
VYM vs. LFRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than LFRIX's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed LFRIX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while LFRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.
VYM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
LFRIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
VYM vs. LFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.37% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund | 1.53% | 6.30% | 8.28% | 12.22% | -2.99% | 5.48% | -1.47% | 7.59% | -0.01% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and LFRIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2007 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. LFRIX — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
LFRIX
VYM vs. LFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VYM | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.97 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.92 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 14.80 | -0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VYM vs. LFRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than LFRIX's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and LFRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -27.90% | -29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -1.55% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -2.59% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -6.23% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -21.75% | -13.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.37% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -1.94% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 0.41% | +1.39% |
Volatility
VYM vs. LFRIX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) at 0.66%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 0.66% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 1.87% | +5.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 2.44% | +8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 2.86% | +11.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 3.91% | +12.44% |
VYM vs. LFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than LFRIX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VYM vs. LFRIX - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than LFRIX's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund | 6.91% | 7.20% | 7.68% | 7.63% | 3.95% | 4.01% | 4.64% | 5.71% | 5.60% | 4.65% | 4.64% | 4.72% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VYM and LFRIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VYM has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to LFRIX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs LFRIX's -27.90%.
LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and LFRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer