PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFRIX vs. TFAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFRIX vs. TFAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I (TFAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFRIX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than TFAIX's 1.00% return.


LFRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.36%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
4.56%

TFAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.13%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.60%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFRIX vs. TFAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
1.65%6.30%8.28%12.22%-2.99%5.48%-1.47%7.59%-0.01%3.97%
TFAIX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I
1.00%6.61%9.06%10.85%-1.85%4.73%1.88%8.71%0.06%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LFRIX and TFAIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between LFRIX and TFAIX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFRIX vs. TFAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFRIX
LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TFAIX
TFAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TFAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFRIX vs. TFAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I (TFAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFRIXTFAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.03

1.78

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

3.41

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

12.91

+2.49

LFRIX vs. TFAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the TFAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFRIX and TFAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFRIX vs. TFAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFRIX drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, which is greater than TFAIX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFRIX and TFAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFRIXTFAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.90%

-19.93%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.55%

-1.59%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.59%

-2.34%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.23%

-5.88%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.44%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-0.78%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.42%

-0.01%

Volatility

LFRIX vs. TFAIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I (TFAIX) have volatilities of 0.65% and 0.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFRIXTFAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.64%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

1.84%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

2.42%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.86%

2.79%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.91%

3.93%

-0.02%

LFRIX vs. TFAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFRIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TFAIX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFRIX vs. TFAIX - Dividend Comparison

LFRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, less than TFAIX's 6.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
6.90%7.20%7.68%7.63%3.95%4.01%4.64%5.71%5.60%4.65%4.64%4.72%
TFAIX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I
6.98%7.14%8.30%7.12%4.13%3.98%4.12%4.97%5.01%4.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFRIX and TFAIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFRIX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to TFAIX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFRIX dropped -27.90% vs TFAIX's -19.93%.

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFRIX and TFAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer