PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. IBTM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. IBTM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VYM is traded in USD, while IBTM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM.L's -0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed IBTM.L with an annualized return of 11.95%, while IBTM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.65% annualized return.


VYM

1D
0.80%
1M
3.01%
YTD
12.37%
6M
11.19%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
11.95%

IBTM.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.39%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
-1.11%
10Y*
0.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. IBTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.37%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.89%8.50%-0.23%2.90%-14.92%-2.66%9.27%9.73%0.47%2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and IBTM.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

-0.08

The correlation between VYM and IBTM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. IBTM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTM.L
IBTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. IBTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VYMIBTM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.10

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

0.79

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

2.26

+11.55

VYM vs. IBTM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and IBTM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VYM vs. IBTM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than IBTM.L's maximum drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and IBTM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMIBTM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-53.26%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-4.18%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-7.61%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-21.13%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-23.64%

-11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-20.74%

+20.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-29.38%

+22.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.46%

+0.34%

Volatility

VYM vs. IBTM.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) at 1.97%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMIBTM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

1.97%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

4.20%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

5.76%

+4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

8.51%

+5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

7.83%

+8.52%

VYM vs. IBTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTM.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VYM vs. IBTM.L - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than IBTM.L's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.36%4.19%3.94%3.16%1.96%1.14%1.69%2.53%2.34%2.02%1.79%1.97%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and IBTM.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTM.L.

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while IBTM.L is Government Bonds. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.07% for IBTM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and IBTM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer