IBTM.L vs. BIL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL).
IBTM.L and BIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. BIL is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Month Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007. Both IBTM.L and BIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTM.L or BIL.
Key characteristics
| IBTM.L | BIL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.43% | 1.94% |
| 1Y Return | -3.13% | 5.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.38% | 2.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.05% | 1.95% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.49% | 1.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.38 | 20.14 |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.76% | 0.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.39% | -0.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.44% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTM.L and BIL is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IBTM.L vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBTM.L achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IBTM.L has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 4.49%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTM.L vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTM.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTM.L vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTM.L vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
IBTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than BIL's 5.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 3.99% | 3.93% | 2.34% | 1.57% | 2.13% | 3.25% | 3.07% | 2.64% | 2.40% | 3.01% | 3.44% | 3.02% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 5.17% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IBTM.L vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTM.L drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTM.L and BIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTM.L vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.09%. This indicates that IBTM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.