VXUS vs. VO
VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXUS returned 10.57%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for VO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VXUS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
VXUS vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.57%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 34.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
VO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
VXUS vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 16.04% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 11.30% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXUS and VO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VXUS and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
VXUS vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXUS
VO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VXUS
VO
Technology
VXUS
VO
Industrials
VXUS
VO
Consumer Cyclical
VXUS
VO
Basic Materials
VXUS
VO
Healthcare
VXUS
VO
Consumer Defensive
VXUS
VO
Energy
VXUS
VO
Communication Services
VXUS
VO
Utilities
VXUS
VO
Real Estate
VXUS
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXUS vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
VXUS
VO
VXUS vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXUS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.27 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 2.45 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 9.23 | +2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXUS vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXUS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.97% | -58.87% | +22.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -8.17% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -19.02% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -27.57% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | -39.37% | +3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.45% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -7.85% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.16% | +0.76% |
Volatility
VXUS vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.35%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXUS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 4.35% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 9.80% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.08% | 12.80% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 17.66% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 18.98% | -1.80% |
VXUS vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VXUS vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than VO's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.51% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXUS and VO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to VO (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 12.03% vs 10.57% for VXUS. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 10.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.35% for VO.
VXUS is categorized as Global Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.03% for VO.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXUS and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer