VWO vs. VIG
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.85%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for VIG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
VWO vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 8.85%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
VIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
VWO vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 12.22% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.57% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and VIG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.69 |
The correlation between VWO and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
VIG
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
VIG
Financial Services
VWO
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
VIG
Industrials
VWO
VIG
Basic Materials
VWO
VIG
Communication Services
VWO
VIG
Energy
VWO
VIG
Healthcare
VWO
VIG
Consumer Defensive
VWO
VIG
Utilities
VWO
VIG
Real Estate
VWO
VIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
VIG
VWO vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWO | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 2.49 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 10.06 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWO | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.97 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.75 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.60 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
VWO vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -46.81% | -20.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -7.91% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -14.95% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.64% | -20.39% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -31.72% | -4.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -0.19% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -5.51% | -10.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.96% | +1.13% |
Volatility
VWO vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.19%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 2.19% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 7.57% | +5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 10.01% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 14.23% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 16.05% | +3.15% |
VWO vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.40% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and VIG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.23% vs 8.85% for VWO. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VIG is Dividend. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer