VWO vs. VGT
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.85%/yr vs 25.78%/yr for VGT. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
VWO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 8.85%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
VWO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 12.22% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and VGT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005 | 0.67 |
The correlation between VWO and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWO vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
VGT
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
VGT
Financial Services
VWO
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
VGT
Industrials
VWO
VGT
Basic Materials
VWO
VGT
Communication Services
VWO
VGT
Energy
VWO
VGT
Healthcare
VWO
VGT
Consumer Defensive
VWO
VGT
-
Utilities
VWO
VGT
-
Real Estate
VWO
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
VGT
VWO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.47 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.69 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 11.77 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.95 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.89 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 1.05 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.68 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
VWO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -54.63% | -13.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -16.40% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -27.23% | +9.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.64% | -35.07% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -35.07% | -1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -1.48% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -7.95% | -7.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 5.13% | -2.04% |
Volatility
VWO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 5.61%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 6.39% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 16.07% | -2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 20.57% | -4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 25.18% | -7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 24.60% | -5.40% |
VWO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.40% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and VGT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VWO (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 8.85% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer