PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 7.69%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.01% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.53%
1M
0.03%
6M
4.14%
YTD
9.99%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
7.69%
ALL TIME*
6.83%

VGT

1D
1.76%
1M
0.44%
6M
22.59%
YTD
22.47%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
24.01%
ALL TIME*
14.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$454.00M$507.98M$575.23M
$402.91M$469.57M$503.00M

VWO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.99%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.47%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and VGT is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.67

The correlation between VWO and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
VGT

Technology

34.2%
98.6%

Financial Services

19.4%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
0.1%

Industrials

7.9%
0.4%

Basic Materials

7.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

6.6%
0.5%

Energy

3.8%
0.3%

Healthcare

3.7%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

VWO
34.2%
VGT
98.6%

Financial Services

VWO
19.4%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
9.1%
VGT
0.1%

Industrials

VWO
7.9%
VGT
0.4%

Basic Materials

VWO
7.2%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

VWO
6.6%
VGT
0.5%

Energy

VWO
3.8%
VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

VWO
3.7%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.3%
VGT

-

Utilities

VWO
2.8%
VGT

-

Real Estate

VWO
2.0%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VWO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.28

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

6.12

+0.40

VWO vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-54.63%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-16.40%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-27.23%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.88%

-35.07%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-35.07%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-8.34%

+4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-7.95%

-7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

6.09%

-2.66%

Volatility

VWO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 5.60%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

8.34%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

20.11%

-5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

24.25%

-6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

25.85%

-8.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

24.90%

-5.73%

VWO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.34%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and VGT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to VWO (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.01% vs 7.69% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.01% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer