VWO vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 9.00%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for RODM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

VWO vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 12.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VWO having a 9.00% annualized return and RODM not far ahead at 9.30%.

VWO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 26.52%
• 3Y*: 16.61%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.00%

RODM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: 9.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	10.77%	25.60%	10.59%	9.25%	-17.98%	1.26%	15.17%	20.75%	-14.76%	31.49%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	12.24%	34.42%	8.02%	15.76%	-14.54%	11.11%	-0.62%	17.15%	-9.97%	25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and RODM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015	0.68

The correlation between VWO and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VWO	RODM
Technology	29.6%	10.8%
Financial Services	19.5%	25.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	5.8%
Industrials	8.0%	16.6%
Basic Materials	8.0%	6.4%
Communication Services	7.1%	5.5%
Energy	4.6%	6.8%
Healthcare	3.9%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	4.0%
Utilities	2.9%	4.9%
Real Estate	2.2%	3.5%

Return for Risk

VWO vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO

VWO Risk / Return Rank: 50
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 81
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VWO	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.31	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	3.24	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.42	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	3.58	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.80	14.22	-6.42

VWO vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VWO vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWO	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.68%	-35.98%	-31.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-7.10%	-4.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.37%	-10.58%	-6.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.60%	-28.85%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.39%	-35.98%	-0.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-0.31%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-6.37%	-9.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	1.78%	+1.39%

Volatility

VWO vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.54%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWO	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	3.54%	+3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.04%	8.76%	+5.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	11.02%	+5.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	13.47%	+4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	15.21%	+4.01%

VWO vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VWO vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than RODM's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.77%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	2.44%	2.79%	3.20%	3.52%	4.11%	2.63%	1.91%	3.23%	2.88%	2.30%	2.52%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWO and RODM in my portfolio?

VWO and RODM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VWO or RODM?

VWO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to RODM (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, VWO or RODM?

On 10-year performance, RODM leads with 9.30% vs 9.00% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VWO or RODM?

Over the 10-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.30% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWO or RODM?

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VWO or RODM?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.44% for VWO.

What is the main difference between VWO and RODM?

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while RODM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.