PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than IUSG's 10.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 9.00%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.63% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.76%
1M
1.90%
YTD
10.77%
6M
12.57%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.00%

IUSG

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
10.18%
6M
11.00%
1Y
29.29%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
17.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.77%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
10.18%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and IUSG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.71

The correlation between VWO and IUSG shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
IUSG

Technology

29.6%
50.5%

Financial Services

19.5%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
8.4%

Industrials

8.0%
6.5%

Basic Materials

8.0%
0.5%

Communication Services

7.1%
15.7%

Energy

4.6%
0.3%

Healthcare

3.9%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
1.1%

Utilities

2.9%
1.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.8%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
IUSG
50.5%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
IUSG
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
IUSG
8.4%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
IUSG
6.5%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
IUSG
0.5%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
IUSG
15.7%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
IUSG
0.3%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
IUSG
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
IUSG
1.1%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
IUSG
1.1%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
IUSG
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.13

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

8.79

-0.99

VWO vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than IUSG's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-63.41%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-13.07%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-22.28%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-32.21%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-32.35%

-4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-4.37%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-21.42%

+5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.16%

+0.01%

Volatility

VWO vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) at 6.20%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

6.20%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.04%

13.25%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

16.46%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

20.97%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

20.46%

-1.24%

VWO vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than IUSG's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.49%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.44%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and IUSG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to IUSG (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.63% vs 9.00% for VWO. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.63% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IUSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.04% for IUSG.

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer