PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 35.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VWO having a 8.97% annualized return and EEMO not far behind at 8.71%.


VWO

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.76%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.67%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
8.97%

EEMO

1D
-8.31%
1M
6.72%
YTD
35.52%
6M
35.05%
1Y
47.55%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.55%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
35.52%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and EEMO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.69

The correlation between VWO and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
EEMO

Technology

31.6%
53.0%

Financial Services

16.8%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
2.8%

Basic Materials

7.0%
9.9%

Industrials

6.8%
7.5%

Communication Services

5.8%
1.2%

Energy

3.6%
0.8%

Healthcare

3.4%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
0.6%

Utilities

2.4%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.3%

Technology

VWO
31.6%
EEMO
53.0%

Financial Services

VWO
16.8%
EEMO
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
8.7%
EEMO
2.8%

Basic Materials

VWO
7.0%
EEMO
9.9%

Industrials

VWO
6.8%
EEMO
7.5%

Communication Services

VWO
5.8%
EEMO
1.2%

Energy

VWO
3.6%
EEMO
0.8%

Healthcare

VWO
3.4%
EEMO
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.1%
EEMO
0.6%

Utilities

VWO
2.4%
EEMO
1.0%

Real Estate

VWO
1.8%
EEMO
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOEEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.24

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

11.80

-3.24

VWO vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-48.47%

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-14.75%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-26.06%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-34.03%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-46.57%

+10.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-8.31%

+5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.79%

-20.11%

+4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

4.04%

-0.87%

Volatility

VWO vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 7.37%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

20.47%

-13.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

28.78%

-14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

30.30%

-13.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

20.93%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

22.33%

-3.15%

VWO vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWO vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than EEMO's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.67%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.33%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and EEMO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to VWO (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 8.97% vs 8.71% for EEMO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.67% for EEMO.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.31% for EEMO.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer