VWO vs. BKEM
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - VWO tracks the FTSE Emerging Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWO returned 5.21%/yr vs 6.39%/yr for BKEM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.
Performance
VWO vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 20.10% return.
VWO
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 21.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
BKEM
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 36.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- —
VWO vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 9.49% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 45.48% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 20.10% | 30.55% | 7.53% | 8.68% | -19.43% | -3.91% | 48.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and BKEM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VWO and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWO vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
BKEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWO
BKEM
Financial Services
VWO
BKEM
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
BKEM
Basic Materials
VWO
BKEM
Industrials
VWO
BKEM
Communication Services
VWO
BKEM
Energy
VWO
BKEM
Healthcare
VWO
BKEM
Consumer Defensive
VWO
BKEM
Utilities
VWO
BKEM
Real Estate
VWO
BKEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
BKEM
VWO vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.82 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 9.64 | -2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and BKEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -39.48% | -28.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -13.11% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -18.38% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.90% | -34.52% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -9.06% | +5.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.76% | -15.81% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.83% | -0.57% |
Volatility
VWO vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 6.48%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 10.87% | -4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.86% | 20.93% | -6.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 22.92% | -5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 19.50% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 19.65% | -0.51% |
VWO vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than BKEM's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.95% | 2.25% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.35% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VWO and BKEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BKEM has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to VWO (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs BKEM's -39.48%.
On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 6.39% vs 5.21% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 6.39% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.95% for BKEM.
VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.11% for BKEM.
BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and BKEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer