PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. BKEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 20.10% return.


VWO

1D
-1.84%
1M
-1.16%
6M
4.57%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
7.91%

BKEM

1D
-3.63%
1M
-4.84%
6M
13.52%
YTD
20.10%
1Y
36.79%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.49%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%45.48%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
20.10%30.55%7.53%8.68%-19.43%-3.91%48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and BKEM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.97

The correlation between VWO and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
BKEM

Technology

31.5%
43.0%

Financial Services

16.8%
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
8.7%

Basic Materials

7.0%
5.7%

Industrials

7.0%
8.1%

Communication Services

5.7%
5.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.4%

Healthcare

3.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.6%

Utilities

2.4%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

VWO
31.5%
BKEM
43.0%

Financial Services

VWO
16.8%
BKEM
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
8.7%
BKEM
8.7%

Basic Materials

VWO
7.0%
BKEM
5.7%

Industrials

VWO
7.0%
BKEM
8.1%

Communication Services

VWO
5.7%
BKEM
5.8%

Energy

VWO
3.6%
BKEM
3.4%

Healthcare

VWO
3.4%
BKEM
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.2%
BKEM
2.6%

Utilities

VWO
2.4%
BKEM
2.0%

Real Estate

VWO
1.8%
BKEM
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOBKEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.82

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

9.64

-2.97

VWO vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and BKEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOBKEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-39.48%

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-13.11%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-18.38%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.90%

-34.52%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-9.06%

+5.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.76%

-15.81%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.83%

-0.57%

Volatility

VWO vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 6.48%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOBKEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

10.87%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

20.93%

-6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

22.92%

-5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

19.50%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

19.65%

-0.51%

VWO vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than BKEM's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.95%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.35%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VWO and BKEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKEM has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to VWO (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 6.39% vs 5.21% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 6.39% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.95% for BKEM.

VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.11% for BKEM.

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and BKEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer