VWID vs. XOMO
VWID (Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWID is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Value Index (net), while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. VWID is passively managed, while XOMO is actively managed. Over the past year, VWID returned 26.99% vs 31.56% for XOMO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWID charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
VWID vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWID achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 16.83% return.
VWID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 12.34%
- 1Y
- 26.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 16.83%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 31.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VWID vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VWID Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | 7.96% | 41.70% | 3.10% | 7.87% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 16.83% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWID and XOMO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023 | 0.20 |
The correlation between VWID and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWID vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
VWID
XOMO
VWID vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWID | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.28 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 2.31 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 6.43 | +5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWID | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.58 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.38 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
VWID vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWID drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWID and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWID | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -18.90% | -15.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -13.73% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -10.21% | +8.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -7.22% | +2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 4.92% | -2.58% |
Volatility
VWID vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) is 0.00%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that VWID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWID | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 7.49% | -7.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 16.60% | -7.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 20.05% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 18.93% | -4.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 18.93% | -2.53% |
VWID vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWID has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWID vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
VWID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than XOMO's 35.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWID Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | 4.54% | 4.86% | 4.48% | 4.97% | 5.73% | 10.70% | 4.71% | 1.99% | 4.55% | 0.74% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 35.68% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWID and XOMO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOMO has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to VWID (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWID dropped -34.64% vs XOMO's -18.90%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 31.56% vs 26.99% for VWID. On fees, VWID is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, VWID has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 31.56% return vs 26.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWID is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 35.68%, compared with 4.54% for VWID.
VWID is categorized as Dividend, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VWID and 1.01% for XOMO.
VWID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWID and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer