PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWID vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWID vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWID achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.


VWID

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
7.96%
6M
12.61%
1Y
27.11%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWID vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWID
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
7.96%41.70%3.10%17.10%-6.43%11.63%4.47%23.97%-10.48%5.32%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between VWID and FDL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017

0.58

The correlation between VWID and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWID vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWID
FDL

Financial Services

29.9%
15.1%

Industrials

13.4%
3.8%

Energy

12.1%
27.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
3.8%

Healthcare

5.9%
16.8%

Basic Materials

5.7%
0.3%

Communication Services

5.6%
10.6%

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Utilities

3.6%
6.5%

Technology

3.3%
1.1%

Financial Services

VWID
29.9%
FDL
15.1%

Industrials

VWID
13.4%
FDL
3.8%

Energy

VWID
12.1%
FDL
27.3%

Consumer Defensive

VWID
8.0%
FDL
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VWID
7.2%
FDL
3.8%

Healthcare

VWID
5.9%
FDL
16.8%

Basic Materials

VWID
5.7%
FDL
0.3%

Communication Services

VWID
5.6%
FDL
10.6%

Real Estate

VWID
5.4%
FDL

-

Utilities

VWID
3.6%
FDL
6.5%

Technology

VWID
3.3%
FDL
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWID vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWID
VWID Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VWID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWID Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VWID Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWID Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWID vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWIDFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

5.56

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

13.56

-1.94

VWID vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWID Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWID and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWIDFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.11

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.88

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.45

+0.19

Drawdowns

VWID vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWID drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWID and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWIDFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-65.93%

+31.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-4.27%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.14%

-12.24%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.30%

-16.46%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-2.18%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-9.66%

+4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.75%

+0.59%

Volatility

VWID vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) is 0.00%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that VWID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWIDFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

2.85%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

7.87%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

11.28%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

14.31%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

17.11%

-0.71%

VWID vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWID has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWID vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

VWID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
VWID
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
4.54%4.86%4.48%4.97%5.73%10.70%4.71%1.99%4.55%0.74%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWID and FDL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to VWID (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWID dropped -34.64% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.51% vs 11.20% for VWID. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, VWID has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 11.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for VWID.

VWID has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.68% for FDL.

VWID is categorized as Dividend, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. VWID tracks MSCI World ex USA Value Index (net), while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VWID and 0.45% for FDL.

VWID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWID and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer