PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWID vs. EMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWID vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWID achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 1.17% return.


VWID

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
7.96%
6M
12.61%
1Y
27.11%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*

EMDV

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.13%
1Y
7.88%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-3.15%
10Y*
2.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWID vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWID
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
7.96%41.70%3.10%17.10%-6.43%11.63%4.47%23.97%-10.48%5.32%
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
1.17%11.90%0.06%-1.03%-18.19%1.11%-0.09%14.93%-7.52%7.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VWID and EMDV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017

0.57

The correlation between VWID and EMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWID vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWID
EMDV

Financial Services

29.9%
24.1%

Industrials

13.4%
6.2%

Energy

12.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
6.2%

Healthcare

5.9%
8.2%

Basic Materials

5.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

5.6%
6.2%

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Utilities

3.6%
8.3%

Technology

3.3%
22.5%

Financial Services

VWID
29.9%
EMDV
24.1%

Industrials

VWID
13.4%
EMDV
6.2%

Energy

VWID
12.1%
EMDV

-

Consumer Defensive

VWID
8.0%
EMDV
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VWID
7.2%
EMDV
6.2%

Healthcare

VWID
5.9%
EMDV
8.2%

Basic Materials

VWID
5.7%
EMDV
1.9%

Communication Services

VWID
5.6%
EMDV
6.2%

Real Estate

VWID
5.4%
EMDV

-

Utilities

VWID
3.6%
EMDV
8.3%

Technology

VWID
3.3%
EMDV
22.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWID vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWID
VWID Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VWID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWID Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VWID Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWID Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDV
EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWID vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWIDEMDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.13

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.09

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

3.33

+8.28

VWID vs. EMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWID Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the EMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWID and EMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWIDEMDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

0.71

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

-0.21

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.22

+0.42

Drawdowns

VWID vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWID drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWID and EMDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWIDEMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-39.20%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-7.24%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.14%

-20.71%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.30%

-34.97%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-14.80%

+12.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-13.55%

+8.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.37%

-0.03%

Volatility

VWID vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) is 0.00%, while ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that VWID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWIDEMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.17%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

9.21%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

11.21%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

15.42%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

18.26%

-1.86%

VWID vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWID has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWID vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

VWID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than EMDV's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
2.41%2.46%2.79%1.88%3.68%2.12%3.12%2.38%1.27%2.09%2.87%
VWID
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
4.54%4.86%4.48%4.97%5.73%10.70%4.71%1.99%4.55%0.74%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWID and EMDV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDV has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to VWID (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWID dropped -34.64% vs EMDV's -39.20%.

On 5-year performance, VWID leads with 11.20% vs -3.15% for EMDV. On fees, VWID is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, VWID has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VWID has performed better with a 11.20% return vs -3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWID is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.

VWID has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.41% for EMDV.

VWID is categorized as Dividend, while EMDV is Emerging Markets Equities. VWID tracks MSCI World ex USA Value Index (net), while EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VWID and 0.60% for EMDV.

VWID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWID and EMDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer