EMDV vs. DIVO
EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. EMDV is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMDV returned -3.15%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for DIVO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMDV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
EMDV vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.53% return.
EMDV
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 7.88%
- 3Y*
- 2.77%
- 5Y*
- -3.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.64%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
EMDV vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 1.17% | 11.90% | 0.06% | -1.03% | -18.19% | 1.11% | -0.09% | 14.93% | -7.52% | 26.98% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.53% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDV and DIVO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.48 |
EMDV vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMDV
DIVO
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
EMDV
DIVO
Technology
EMDV
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
EMDV
DIVO
Utilities
EMDV
DIVO
Healthcare
EMDV
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
EMDV
DIVO
Communication Services
EMDV
DIVO
Industrials
EMDV
DIVO
Basic Materials
EMDV
DIVO
Energy
EMDV
-
DIVO
Real Estate
EMDV
-
DIVO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDV vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
EMDV
DIVO
EMDV vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMDV | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.36 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 3.10 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 11.21 | -7.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMDV | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 2.06 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.89 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.85 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
EMDV vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDV | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.20% | -30.04% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -5.95% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.71% | -12.12% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.97% | -13.72% | -21.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.80% | -0.82% | -13.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -2.61% | -10.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 1.64% | +0.73% |
Volatility
EMDV vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.01%. This indicates that EMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDV | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 2.01% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 6.88% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 8.97% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 11.94% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 14.84% | +3.42% |
EMDV vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDV vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than DIVO's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.42% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.41% | 2.46% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDV and DIVO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMDV has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to DIVO (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDV dropped -39.20% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.61% vs -3.15% for EMDV. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs -3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 2.41% for EMDV.
EMDV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMDV and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMDV and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer