PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 15.14%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.


VV

1D
0.68%
1M
0.19%
6M
8.54%
YTD
9.78%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
10.97%

VYM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.56%
6M
9.31%
YTD
14.21%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$85.99M$75.21M$96.89M
$195.34M$198.02M$200.78M

VV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
9.78%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.21%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and VYM is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between VV and VYM has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
VYM

Technology

39.1%
17.8%

Financial Services

11.5%
21.0%

Communication Services

9.7%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
6.8%

Healthcare

8.9%
13.2%

Industrials

8.2%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
8.1%

Energy

3.0%
8.6%

Utilities

2.5%
5.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.0%

Technology

VV
39.1%
VYM
17.8%

Financial Services

VV
11.5%
VYM
21.0%

Communication Services

VV
9.7%
VYM
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.0%
VYM
6.8%

Healthcare

VV
8.9%
VYM
13.2%

Industrials

VV
8.2%
VYM
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.4%
VYM
8.1%

Energy

VV
3.0%
VYM
8.6%

Utilities

VV
2.5%
VYM
5.7%

Basic Materials

VV
1.7%
VYM
3.3%

Real Estate

VV
1.6%
VYM
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.56

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

13.40

-4.69

VV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-56.98%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-6.69%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-14.46%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-15.84%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-35.21%

+0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-1.15%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-7.14%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.78%

+0.40%

Volatility

VV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.46%. This indicates that VV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

2.46%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

7.42%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

10.29%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

13.87%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

16.29%

+1.92%

VV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VV and VYM have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than VYM's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.24%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VV and VYM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to VYM (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.14% vs 11.71% for VYM. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV and VYM have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.02% for VV.

VV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer