PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 15.58%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.


VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and VYM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.89

The correlation between VV and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
VYM

Technology

35.9%
17.7%

Financial Services

11.8%
20.5%

Communication Services

11.2%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
6.7%

Healthcare

8.6%
12.2%

Industrials

8.0%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
8.1%

Energy

3.6%
9.8%

Utilities

2.7%
5.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.5%

Technology

VV
35.9%
VYM
17.7%

Financial Services

VV
11.8%
VYM
20.5%

Communication Services

VV
11.2%
VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.8%
VYM
6.7%

Healthcare

VV
8.6%
VYM
12.2%

Industrials

VV
8.0%
VYM
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.8%
VYM
8.1%

Energy

VV
3.6%
VYM
9.8%

Utilities

VV
2.7%
VYM
5.7%

Real Estate

VV
1.7%
VYM
0.0%

Basic Materials

VV
1.6%
VYM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.93

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

14.76

-0.90

VV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.56

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.83

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.73

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.51

+0.08

Drawdowns

VV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-56.98%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-6.69%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-14.46%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-15.84%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-35.21%

+0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.43%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-7.19%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.78%

+0.23%

Volatility

VV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.77%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

7.67%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

10.28%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

13.96%

+3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

16.34%

+1.85%

VV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VV and VYM have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VV and VYM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.58% vs 11.90% for VYM. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV and VYM have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.98% for VV.

VV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer