VV vs. PBUS
VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VV returned 13.54%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for PBUS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
VV vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VV having a 10.69% return and PBUS slightly higher at 10.82%.
VV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
VV vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.69% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 7.49% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between VV and PBUS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VV and PBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.89 (all time) to 1.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VV vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VV
PBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VV
PBUS
Financial Services
VV
PBUS
Communication Services
VV
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
VV
PBUS
Healthcare
VV
PBUS
Industrials
VV
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
VV
PBUS
Energy
VV
PBUS
Utilities
VV
PBUS
Real Estate
VV
PBUS
Basic Materials
VV
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VV vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
VV
PBUS
VV vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VV | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 2.30 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 3.15 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 3.08 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.86 | 13.93 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VV | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.30 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
VV vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than PBUS's maximum drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VV | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -33.15% | -21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -9.02% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -19.07% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -25.40% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.64% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -5.13% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.99% | +0.02% |
Volatility
VV vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VV | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.94% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 9.13% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 12.06% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 17.05% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 19.33% | -1.14% |
VV vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VV and PBUS have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VV vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, which matches PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, VV and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PBUS has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.54% vs 13.48% for PBUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV and PBUS have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
VV and PBUS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.98%.
VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VV and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer