PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. PBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VV having a 10.69% return and PBUS slightly higher at 10.82%.


VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%

PBUS

1D
-0.64%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.68%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%7.49%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
10.82%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and PBUS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.89

The correlation between VV and PBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.89 (all time) to 1.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VV vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
PBUS

Technology

35.9%
35.4%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.6%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.0%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.8%

Technology

VV
35.9%
PBUS
35.4%

Financial Services

VV
11.8%
PBUS
11.6%

Communication Services

VV
11.2%
PBUS
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.8%
PBUS
10.1%

Healthcare

VV
8.6%
PBUS
8.6%

Industrials

VV
8.0%
PBUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.8%
PBUS
4.8%

Energy

VV
3.6%
PBUS
3.6%

Utilities

VV
2.7%
PBUS
2.3%

Real Estate

VV
1.7%
PBUS
1.9%

Basic Materials

VV
1.6%
PBUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVPBUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.30

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

3.15

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.08

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.86

13.93

-0.08

VV vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVPBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.30

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.80

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.80

-0.20

Drawdowns

VV vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than PBUS's maximum drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and PBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVPBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-33.15%

-21.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-9.02%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-19.07%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-25.40%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.64%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-5.13%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.99%

+0.02%

Volatility

VV vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVPBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.94%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

9.13%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

12.06%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.05%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

19.33%

-1.14%

VV vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VV and PBUS have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VV vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, which matches PBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
0.98%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, VV and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PBUS has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs PBUS's -33.15%.

On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.54% vs 13.48% for PBUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV and PBUS have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

VV and PBUS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.98%.

VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and PBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer