PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBUS vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBUS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 10.61% return.


PBUS

1D
0.70%
1M
0.20%
6M
8.62%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.93%

SPTM

1D
0.62%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.29M$14.70M$26.21M
$40.04M$39.69M$45.49M

PBUS vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
10.03%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
10.61%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%7.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PBUS and SPTM is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

0.90

The correlation between PBUS and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBUS vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBUS
SPTM

Technology

37.9%
36.3%

Financial Services

11.4%
12.5%

Communication Services

9.8%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.1%

Healthcare

9.1%
9.3%

Industrials

9.0%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.5%

Energy

3.1%
3.5%

Utilities

2.2%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.2%

Technology

PBUS
37.9%
SPTM
36.3%

Financial Services

PBUS
11.4%
SPTM
12.5%

Communication Services

PBUS
9.8%
SPTM
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PBUS
9.6%
SPTM
9.1%

Healthcare

PBUS
9.1%
SPTM
9.3%

Industrials

PBUS
9.0%
SPTM
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

PBUS
4.5%
SPTM
4.5%

Energy

PBUS
3.1%
SPTM
3.5%

Utilities

PBUS
2.2%
SPTM
2.6%

Real Estate

PBUS
1.8%
SPTM
2.3%

Basic Materials

PBUS
1.7%
SPTM
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBUS vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBUS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBUSSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.31

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

10.07

-1.16

PBUS vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBUS and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBUS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBUSSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-54.80%

+21.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-8.68%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-18.87%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

-24.14%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.11%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-9.00%

+3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.99%

+0.16%

Volatility

PBUS vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBUSSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.50%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

10.02%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

12.81%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

16.97%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

18.03%

+1.23%

PBUS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PBUS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SPTM's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
1.02%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PBUS and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PBUS has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to SPTM (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 12.48% vs 12.30% for PBUS. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for PBUS.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 1.02% for PBUS.

PBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPTM is Large Cap Blend Equities. PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBUS and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer