VUSB vs. FLTR
VUSB (Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. VUSB is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUSB returned 3.45%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUSB charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
VUSB vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSB achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.03% return.
VUSB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
VUSB vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.48% | 5.20% | 5.68% | 5.52% | -0.36% | 0.08% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 2.03% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSB and FLTR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSB vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
VUSB
FLTR
VUSB vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUSB | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.34 | 3.13 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.12 | 16.83 | -4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 69.82 | 100.54 | -30.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUSB vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSB drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSB and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSB | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -17.84% | +16.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.37% | -0.31% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.46% | -1.93% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.79% | -3.06% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -0.67% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.05% | +0.01% |
Volatility
VUSB vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF (VUSB) is 0.19%, while VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a volatility of 0.26%. This indicates that VUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSB | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 0.26% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.53% | 0.63% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65% | 0.78% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.83% | 2.13% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 5.00% | -4.18% |
VUSB vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUSB vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
VUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 4.39% | 4.63% | 5.16% | 4.45% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUSB and FLTR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLTR has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to VUSB (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUSB dropped -1.79% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 5-year performance, FLTR leads with 4.50% vs 3.45% for VUSB. On fees, VUSB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUSB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.39% for VUSB.
VUSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VUSB and 0.14% for FLTR.
VUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.91 vs 6.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUSB and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer