VUG vs. VNQ
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.88%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for VNQ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VNQ.
Performance
VUG vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 11.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 17.88%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.
VUG
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
VUG vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 4.80% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 11.49% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and VNQ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VUG and VNQ has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VUG vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
VNQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VUG
VNQ
Communication Services
VUG
VNQ
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
VNQ
-
Healthcare
VUG
VNQ
-
Financial Services
VUG
VNQ
Industrials
VUG
VNQ
Consumer Defensive
VUG
VNQ
-
Real Estate
VUG
VNQ
Utilities
VUG
VNQ
-
Basic Materials
VUG
VNQ
Energy
VUG
VNQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
VNQ
VUG vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUG | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.17 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.50 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 4.71 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUG vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and VNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -73.07% | +22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -8.34% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -17.46% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -34.48% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -42.40% | +6.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -0.49% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -13.61% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 2.65% | +2.13% |
Volatility
VUG vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 4.74%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 4.74% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 9.74% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 13.52% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 18.85% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 20.72% | +0.76% |
VUG vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUG vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than VNQ's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.57% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUG and VNQ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to VNQ (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs VNQ's -73.07%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.88% vs 5.53% for VNQ. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VNQ is REIT. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.13% for VNQ.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and VNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer