PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUG vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUG vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.


VUG

1D
-1.37%
1M
-0.15%
6M
7.19%
YTD
6.69%
1Y
17.10%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
17.61%

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
6.69%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-4.22%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and QARP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.83

The correlation between VUG and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUG vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUG
QARP

Technology

56.5%
23.5%

Communication Services

15.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
9.6%

Healthcare

4.6%
13.9%

Financial Services

4.0%
12.1%

Industrials

3.5%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
9.6%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.0%

Utilities

0.7%
2.0%

Basic Materials

0.6%
2.3%

Energy

0.3%
5.8%

Technology

VUG
56.5%
QARP
23.5%

Communication Services

VUG
15.9%
QARP
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VUG
11.6%
QARP
9.6%

Healthcare

VUG
4.6%
QARP
13.9%

Financial Services

VUG
4.0%
QARP
12.1%

Industrials

VUG
3.5%
QARP
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

VUG
1.3%
QARP
9.6%

Real Estate

VUG
0.9%
QARP
1.0%

Utilities

VUG
0.7%
QARP
2.0%

Basic Materials

VUG
0.6%
QARP
2.3%

Energy

VUG
0.3%
QARP
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUG vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUGQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

3.46

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.42

15.38

-11.96

VUG vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUG vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUGQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-35.44%

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-7.26%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-15.65%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

-22.75%

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

0.00%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-4.39%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

1.63%

+3.38%

Volatility

VUG vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUGQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

2.76%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.99%

8.22%

+5.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

10.58%

+6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

15.54%

+6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

19.55%

+1.96%

VUG vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUG vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUG and QARP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 12.97% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUG and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer