VUG vs. IHI
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.90%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for IHI. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IHI.
Performance
VUG vs. IHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly higher than IHI's -20.02% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed IHI with an annualized return of 17.90%, while IHI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.
VUG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
IHI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- -20.02%
- 6M
- -19.99%
- 1Y
- -18.55%
- 3Y*
- -2.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
VUG vs. IHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 4.99% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -20.02% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and IHI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VUG and IHI has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VUG vs. IHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
IHI
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
VUG
IHI
-
Communication Services
VUG
IHI
-
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
IHI
-
Healthcare
VUG
IHI
Financial Services
VUG
IHI
-
Industrials
VUG
IHI
Consumer Defensive
VUG
IHI
-
Real Estate
VUG
IHI
-
Utilities
VUG
IHI
-
Basic Materials
VUG
IHI
-
Energy
VUG
IHI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. IHI — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
IHI
VUG vs. IHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUG | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.83 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | -0.71 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | -1.71 | +6.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUG vs. IHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IHI drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and IHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -49.65% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -26.11% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -26.64% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -33.12% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -33.25% | -2.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -24.48% | +18.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -8.34% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 10.84% | -6.05% |
Volatility
VUG vs. IHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is 5.73%, while iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that VUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 6.31% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 13.27% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 17.21% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 19.02% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 19.82% | +1.66% |
VUG vs. IHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IHI's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUG vs. IHI - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than IHI's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.45% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUG and IHI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to VUG (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs IHI's -49.65%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.90% vs 8.85% for IHI. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IHI.
IHI has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IHI is Health & Biotech Equities. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.43% for IHI.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and IHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer