PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHI vs. IHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHI vs. IHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -15.32% return, which is significantly lower than IHF's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has underperformed IHF with an annualized return of 8.58%, while IHF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.49% annualized return.


IHI

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.21%
6M
-12.40%
YTD
-15.32%
1Y
-11.60%
3Y*
-1.46%
5Y*
-3.35%
10Y*
8.58%
ALL TIME*
10.02%

IHF

1D
-0.65%
1M
-1.95%
6M
24.31%
YTD
18.08%
1Y
39.67%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
9.49%
ALL TIME*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.12M$27.16M$26.59M
$145.90M$167.07M$148.77M

IHI vs. IHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHI
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF
-15.32%6.88%8.62%3.24%-19.80%21.03%24.17%32.75%15.45%30.81%
IHF
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
18.08%0.92%-7.90%-1.11%-7.11%24.46%17.67%22.34%9.56%25.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IHI and IHF is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between IHI and IHF has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IHI vs. IHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IHI
IHF

Healthcare

100.0%
95.2%

Technology

0.3%
4.4%

Industrials

0.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IHI
100.0%
IHF
95.2%

Technology

IHI
0.3%
IHF
4.4%

Industrials

IHI
0.2%
IHF
0.1%

Basic Materials

IHI

-

IHF

-

Communication Services

IHI

-

IHF

-

Consumer Cyclical

IHI

-

IHF

-

Consumer Defensive

IHI

-

IHF

-

Energy

IHI

-

IHF

-

Financial Services

IHI

-

IHF
0.3%

Real Estate

IHI

-

IHF

-

Utilities

IHI

-

IHF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHI vs. IHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IHI
IHI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHI Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IHF
IHF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IHI vs. IHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHIIHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.34

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

1.88

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

5.15

-6.03

IHI vs. IHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHI Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the IHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHI and IHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHI vs. IHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum IHF drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and IHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHIIHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

-58.42%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.11%

-19.72%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-29.85%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.12%

-29.85%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

-35.23%

+1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.04%

-2.98%

-17.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-10.59%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.27%

7.18%

+6.09%

Volatility

IHI vs. IHF - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) at 4.88%. This indicates that IHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHIIHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.58%

4.88%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

12.93%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.90%

20.62%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.55%

19.29%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

21.04%

-1.03%

IHI vs. IHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IHI and IHF have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

IHI vs. IHF - Dividend Comparison

IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than IHF's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHF
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
0.93%1.05%0.86%0.79%0.74%0.56%0.53%0.58%4.01%0.19%0.25%0.20%
IHI
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF
0.46%0.34%0.46%0.53%0.45%0.25%0.25%0.33%0.26%0.37%0.55%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHI and IHF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHI has higher volatility (9.58%) compared to IHF (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs IHF's -58.42%.

On 10-year performance, IHF leads with 9.49% vs 8.58% for IHI. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, IHF has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IHF has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHI and IHF have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

IHF has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.46% for IHI.

IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Healthcare Providers Index.

IHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHI and IHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer