PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUG vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VUG vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VUG vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
-9.39%29.60%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
10.10%27.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a -9.39% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 10.10% return.


VUG

1D
1.09%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
-9.39%
6M
-8.17%
1Y
18.52%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
16.16%

FMTM

1D
1.78%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
10.10%
6M
17.46%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VUG vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VUG vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUGFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.68

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

2.20

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

3.23

-2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.15

12.18

-8.03

VUG vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and FMTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUGFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.68

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.71

-1.13

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and FMTM is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

VUG vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than FMTM's 0.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.45%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VUG vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and FMTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VUGFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-12.12%

-38.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-12.12%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.25%

-6.27%

-5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-1.89%

-5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.72%

3.21%

+1.51%

Volatility

VUG vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is 7.12%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that VUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VUGFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

10.78%

-3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

19.28%

-6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.70%

23.38%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.22%

23.19%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

23.19%

-1.81%