VUG vs. CNYA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while CNYA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUG returned 14.33%/yr vs -1.67%/yr for CNYA. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CNYA.

Performance

VUG vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's 4.11% return.

VUG

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 5.11%
• 1Y: 23.11%
• 3Y*: 24.71%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: 17.95%

CNYA

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -4.23%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 6M: 6.49%
• 1Y: 30.18%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: -1.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	6.14%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF	4.11%	26.48%	10.78%	-13.76%	-26.51%	3.53%	41.54%	35.95%	-26.56%	30.99%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and CNYA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016	0.36

The correlation between VUG and CNYA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUG vs. CNYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUG	CNYA
Technology	53.5%	30.0%
Communication Services	17.3%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	5.7%
Healthcare	4.6%	3.8%
Financial Services	4.3%	17.0%
Industrials	3.6%	18.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	6.7%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.7%
Utilities	0.9%	3.2%
Basic Materials	0.6%	10.6%
Energy	0.4%	3.2%

Return for Risk

VUG vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 40
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CNYA

CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 64
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUG	CNYA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.71	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	2.39	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	3.99	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.90	11.48	-6.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUG vs. CNYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the CNYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and CNYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUG	CNYA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.71	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	-0.07	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.25	+0.36

Drawdowns

VUG vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, roughly equal to the maximum CNYA drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and CNYA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUG	CNYA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.68%	-49.49%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.53%	-7.59%	-8.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-33.35%	+10.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.61%	-44.65%	+9.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.52%	-17.53%	+13.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-20.68%	+13.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.73%	2.64%	+2.09%

Volatility

VUG vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is 5.17%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that VUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUG	CNYA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	6.87%	-1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	12.79%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.25%	17.73%	-1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	23.85%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.48%	23.57%	-2.09%

VUG vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUG vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than CNYA's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF	1.84%	1.92%	2.51%	4.23%	2.69%	1.11%	1.06%	1.21%	3.92%	0.97%	1.38%	0.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUG and CNYA in my portfolio?

VUG and CNYA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VUG or CNYA?

CNYA has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to VUG (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs CNYA's -49.49%.

Which ETF is better, VUG or CNYA?

On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 14.33% vs -1.67% for CNYA. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VUG or CNYA?

Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 14.33% return vs -1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUG or CNYA?

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VUG or CNYA?

CNYA has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.38% for VUG.

What is the main difference between VUG and CNYA?

VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CNYA is China Equities. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.60% for CNYA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.