PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNYA vs. FLCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNYA vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -4.71% return.


CNYA

1D
2.38%
1M
1.83%
YTD
9.25%
6M
13.58%
1Y
39.08%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
-0.82%
10Y*

FLCH

1D
2.58%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-4.71%
6M
-6.63%
1Y
11.26%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
-4.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNYA vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
9.25%26.48%10.78%-13.76%-26.51%3.53%41.54%35.95%-26.56%1.52%
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-4.71%32.55%18.00%-11.21%-22.74%-20.87%30.09%24.32%-19.52%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CNYA and FLCH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.76

The correlation between CNYA and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNYA vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNYA
FLCH

Technology

30.0%
12.9%

Industrials

18.3%
9.1%

Financial Services

17.0%
18.2%

Basic Materials

10.6%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
23.4%

Healthcare

3.8%
5.3%

Energy

3.2%
3.7%

Utilities

3.2%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.7%

Communication Services

0.6%
14.2%

Technology

CNYA
30.0%
FLCH
12.9%

Industrials

CNYA
18.3%
FLCH
9.1%

Financial Services

CNYA
17.0%
FLCH
18.2%

Basic Materials

CNYA
10.6%
FLCH
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

CNYA
6.7%
FLCH
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CNYA
5.7%
FLCH
23.4%

Healthcare

CNYA
3.8%
FLCH
5.3%

Energy

CNYA
3.2%
FLCH
3.7%

Utilities

CNYA
3.2%
FLCH
2.0%

Real Estate

CNYA
0.7%
FLCH
1.7%

Communication Services

CNYA
0.6%
FLCH
14.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNYA vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNYA
CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCH
FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYA vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNYAFLCHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

0.59

+1.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.10

0.95

+2.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.12

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

0.78

+4.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.37

1.65

+13.71

CNYA vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYA Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYA and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNYAFLCHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

0.59

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.15

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.03

+0.25

Drawdowns

CNYA vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and FLCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNYAFLCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-62.09%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-15.52%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-25.43%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.70%

-55.78%

+11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.45%

-32.83%

+19.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-30.53%

+9.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

7.32%

-4.76%

Volatility

CNYA vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) have volatilities of 6.44% and 6.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNYAFLCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

6.40%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

13.58%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

19.16%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.81%

29.60%

-5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.56%

27.91%

-4.35%

CNYA vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNYA vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than FLCH's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
1.75%1.92%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.06%1.21%3.92%0.97%1.38%
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
2.48%2.36%2.87%3.47%2.69%1.48%0.91%1.98%1.92%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNYA and FLCH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNYA has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to FLCH (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNYA dropped -49.49% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

On 5-year performance, CNYA leads with -0.82% vs -4.43% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CNYA has performed better with a -0.82% return vs -4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.75% for CNYA.

CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNYA and 0.19% for FLCH.

CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNYA and FLCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer