VTWV vs. TSCV
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. VTWV is passively managed, while TSCV is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TSCV.
Performance
VTWV vs. TSCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTWV having a 21.24% return and TSCV slightly lower at 21.01%.
VTWV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 21.24%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 45.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
TSCV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWV vs. TSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 21.24% | 4.56% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 21.01% | 6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and TSCV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. TSCV — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
TSCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTWV vs. TSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTWV | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. TSCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than TSCV's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and TSCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -10.17% | -35.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -1.95% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | — | — |
Volatility
VTWV vs. TSCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 16.73% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 16.73% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 16.73% | +6.84% |
VTWV vs. TSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTWV vs. TSCV - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than TSCV's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.23% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWV and TSCV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.
VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.23% for TSCV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.60% for TSCV.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and TSCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer