TSCV vs. BSMC
TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) and BSMC (Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSCV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BSMC.
Performance
TSCV vs. BSMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCV achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than BSMC's 16.23% return.
TSCV
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BSMC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- 31.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $430.04K | $466.32K | $438.95K | |
| $63.49K | $44.24K | $64.04K |
TSCV vs. BSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 20.85% | 6.24% |
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 16.23% | 4.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCV and BSMC is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCV vs. BSMC — Risk / Return Rank
TSCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSMC
TSCV vs. BSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCV | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCV vs. BSMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCV drawdown since its inception was -10.17%, smaller than the maximum BSMC drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCV and BSMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCV | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -19.15% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -1.41% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -2.58% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.44% | — |
Volatility
TSCV vs. BSMC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCV | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 14.49% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 15.96% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 15.96% | +0.15% |
TSCV vs. BSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BSMC's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCV vs. BSMC - Dividend Comparison
TSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than BSMC's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.90% | 1.17% | 1.02% | 0.15% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.23% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCV and BSMC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSCV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSCV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BSMC.
BSMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.23% for TSCV.
They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Brandes. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TSCV and 0.70% for BSMC.
Find the right allocation for TSCV and BSMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer